

Can someone sort out now what the points total will be, to save squabbling nearer the time? – iride scent 13:44, 15 February 2010 (UTC) Reply Since every FA is unique in some way, we go strictly by the categories at WP:FA for determining underrepresentation. In the inexplicable absence of "People who became the subject of personality cults among early socialists, feminists and white-supremacists, after having fallen out of a window" as a category at WP:FA, she's listed in the catch-all "History" section (maybe sometime someone could explain why the battles, royalty and hurricanes aren't history.) but it has no relationship to any other article in that section depending on how one interprets the criteria, she could have anything from -1 to +5 points.
#Fantasy football trade suggester how to#
She definitely gets two points on either 24 or 26 April for the 125th anniversary of her death (fatally injured on the 24th, life pronounced extinct on the 26th), but I've no idea how to calculate diversity and underrepresentation – there literally is no similar article I can think of on Wikipedia. I'm considering nominating Alice Ayres for April, but have no idea what the points total would be. 48.1 Draft rule on "sixth spot": articleĭiversity/Underrepresentation points for a "miscellaneous or unclassifiable topic".39 Nominating - request for clarification.35 Lost finale and proposal to revise May 24 TFA.27 I missed checking this page for a little while.22 RfC on protection of Main Page Featured Article.14.1 John Douglas (architect): 5 points.4 Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov-three points or two?.2 Baltimore Steam Packet Company ("Old Bay Line") for March 18?.1 Diversity/Underrepresentation points for a "miscellaneous or unclassifiable topic".
#Fantasy football trade suggester free#
Like Jackson, he's currently a free agent in 2023, so getting locked into a long-term deal with his good friend and college quarterback would only help Brown's long-term floor. Speaking of Brown, we could see him move up the trade chart if he's next for an extension. For what it's worth, that's exactly what I expect from Bateman in 2022. Jackson still has Mark Andrews, but he'll have to hope for a breakout from Rashod Bateman if he's to have two legitimate options in the passing game. The other thing that helps Murray's floor is that he now has Jackson's former No. Jackson is technically a free agent after this year, though it's admittedly difficult to imagine a scenario in which the Ravens let him walk. Neither Murray nor Jackson necessarily has the build that makes you think they can take a beating over 17 games, but Murray is ahead of Jackson as a passer and now has security in Dynasty if he does miss a year due to injury. While the NFL has evolved over the past decade, the future can still be dicey for run-heavy quarterbacks. Now we know where Murray will be for the next five-plus years and that's still a bit of a question for Jackson. Jackson has shown us more full-season upside, but Murray has been close when he's been able to stay healthy. They're separated by less than a point in the trade chart below and the difference between them has been similar for most of the past year. The main takeaway from the swap is how close I view Murray and Jackson, but also that Murray does carry slightly less risk than Jackson in Dynasty leagues. In response, I swapped Murray and Lamar Jackson in my Dynasty quarterback rankings for the fifth time in the past 10 months. On Thursday the Arizona Cardinals announced they'd signed Kyler Murray to a contract extension through the 2028 season.
